Supreme Court allows Reddit mods to anonymously defend Section 230

Re:Supreme Court allows Reddit mods to anonymously defend Se... by killjoywashere on Monday January 23, 2023 @12:17AM (#34485768)

I think this is a catastrophy of American exceptionalism, really American narcissism. The idea that the provenance of ideas doesn't matter is insane to anyone who voted for Mr. Splashypants. How can you expect amicus briefs to the highest court in the land to become anything besides spam if they don't have attribution?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court allows Reddit mods to anonymously defend Se... by ETH_start on Monday January 23, 2023 @03:33AM (#34486683)

Reddit mods are pseudonymous. You can't easily become one - especially for a major community - and they have reputations attached to them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Supreme Court allows Reddit mods to anonymously defend Se... by nl on Monday January 23, 2023 @05:00AM (#34487107)

I think there's a difference between anonymous briefs and including information from anonymous people in yours.

[ Parent | on HN ]