Your pointless exercise with wordplay is just a typical religious weaseling. I intentionally mentioned the age and you took the bait exactly like I expected, which shows. You dare to assume your "mature" reading is somehow more mature than Sir Isaac Newton's, and even to 10yo me it would be clear (even if you ignore the fact, that days are literally used in Genesis, which is the whole point I made and you continue proving by continuing to claim otherwise), that some random dude is more capable correctly comprehending Old Testament than Newton is laughable.
Re:Make Believe
by cratermoon on Sunday January 22, 2023 @03:33PM
(#34481915)
I appreciate that many people have negative reactions to religion, for good reason, and I sympathize. I was there myself. I hope you find your peace, and take it easy on the personal attacks online.
The Ussher and other timelines are examples of making the incomplete and conflicting data of ages and lineages given in the text fit a pre-conceived idea, that being the Earth is was created by God and Adam placed on it in the Garden of Eden, and the date of the creation is therefore just prior to Adam's creation. Given that assumption, the biblical literalists and young earth creationist have invented a timeline that ignores the inconsistencies, fills in gaps, and basically plays hash with anything in the actual text.
Certainly reading a children's version of the Bible will result in a child's conception of what the text says. I remember learning similar dumb ideas as a child. But now I'm an adult and I've expanded my knowledge to adult understanding. Yes, when I was a child, I spoke, thought, and reasoned like a child. Becoming an adult means giving up those childish things and bringing one's fully mature thinking and reasoning.
Holding on to a childish version of Biblical stories and a childish understanding of how believers think does a disservice to intellectual curiosity.