News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GitHub Sunsetting Subversion Support. Parent comment

Re:GitHub Sunsetting Subversion Support by klyrs on Friday January 20, 2023 @02:32PM (#34458498)
> I wanted to announce this on April Fool's Day, but just couldn't make the timing work.

Thank you for not doing that. Releasing a wacky feature on April 1 is funny. Discontinuing a service that people might rely on is distinctly un-funny.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub Sunsetting Subversion Support by adamdusty on Friday January 20, 2023 @03:48PM (#34459710)
I disagree. It would probably prompt a few support calls and emails, but otherwise I think it would be great.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub Sunsetting Subversion Support by klyrs on Friday January 20, 2023 @10:41PM (#34463647)
I don't read the news on April 1 because it got old decades ago. Sunsetting a service, rather than killing it outright, is a kindness. Making the announcement on April 1 means people will miss it or ignore it. Uncool.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub Sunsetting Subversion Support by rhaway84773 on Sunday January 22, 2023 @12:21AM (#34474578)
“A few support calls” = At least a few companies who have unnecessarily faced major enough issues that they worked through internal investigations of many different pieces in the stack and then eventually decided to reach out to external support for GitHub, potentially having reached out to other vendors’s support because some PM thought it would be “funny”.

I don’t actually think it would cause any problems personally, but I’m astonished at the flip dismissal of a “few support calls”.

[ Parent | on HN ]