Re:Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
by progx on Friday January 20, 2023 @11:03AM
(#34454926)
For me not. In the Pipe example you must read first that something is done with the object and that it will be output at the end.
If i read a code and i want to now what it will do, i wanna first read that it will output something. If that is what i search for, i read the nested code.
With the pipe style i waste more time, even if the code looks clearer.
If i read a code and i want to now what it will do, i wanna first read that it will output something. If that is what i search for, i read the nested code.
With the pipe style i waste more time, even if the code looks clearer.
I not overused example could look like this:
If i don't care about console.log, i don't have to read the nested code.