News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by nerdo on Thursday January 19, 2023 @03:59PM (#34445518)
Banks run the world, IBM mainframes run the banks.
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by dralley on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:49PM (#34446119)
>IBM mainframes run the banks.

And the airlines, and the logistics companies

Re:IBM Quantum System Two by sophacles on Thursday January 19, 2023 @04:50PM (#34446139)
That's a bit unfair to the insurance companies. They have a pretty big say in what happens and also run mainframes.
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by hcks on Thursday January 19, 2023 @06:13PM (#34446967)
And mainframes run on concrete floors, maybe construction companies run the world by that logic?
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by nerdo on Thursday January 19, 2023 @08:22PM (#34448018)
Mainframes aren't a big truck, they're a series of concrete floors.
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by rbanffy on Friday January 20, 2023 @06:46PM (#34461879)
My usual comparison is with cargo airplanes.
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by Nursie on Thursday January 19, 2023 @09:18PM (#34448395)
This is becoming less true over time.
Re:IBM Quantum System Two by dekhn on Thursday January 19, 2023 @05:22PM (#34446519)
many of the most core US IT infrastructure projects- government and commercial- depend on IBM 360 assembly code or another IBM system, written decades ago that has been repeatedly scaled to handle the increase in load.

Two I can think of: SABRE and the IRS. See more here: https://www.nextgov.com/cxo-briefing/2016/05/10-oldest-it-sy...

Personally I have a ton of respect for production systems that can be scaled in place for 50 years. But I don't have any interest in learning to run IBM mainframes or code for them- I'm preparing for lots of contract work in 2037.