News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Supreme Court Poised to Reconsider Key Tenets of Online S... by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Thursday January 19, 2023 @03:21PM (#34445094)
It doesn't say illegal, it says good Samaritan blocking of objectionable material.

If it doesn't have anything to do with curation (publisher) vs firehose then what does this mean:

> No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker

What is a publisher and why do they need to say this? What distinction is there? Were they treated as a publisher before Section 230?

There are no comments on this comment yet.