Re:Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point.
by karaterobot on Thursday January 19, 2023 @11:55AM
(#34442532)
Only if you create an account and log in, right? I've gotten along without having a Wikipedia account for the last 20 years, I guess now I have to make one. If that was a product goal, it was a very sneaky success.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point.
by sdiacom on Thursday January 19, 2023 @12:15PM
(#34442818)
I'm pretty sure that "getting the same four Hacker News users, who feel personally wronged every time a website becomes more readable, to sign up" is nowhere near the top of their list of priorities.
Re:Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point.
by karaterobot on Thursday January 19, 2023 @12:21PM
(#34442884)
Grrr, I hate readability! Just the idea of proper line lengths makes me angry.
But I think everybody has to create an account, not just us salty grandpas. Like I said, if it was a product goal, it's a sneaky way to do it. Not saying that is the case.
Re:Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point.
by sdiacom on Thursday January 19, 2023 @12:31PM
(#34443019)
Sneaky indeed. So sneaky, in fact, that it would be completely ineffective.
Re:Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point.
by karaterobot on Thursday January 19, 2023 @12:45PM
(#34443182)
I dunno, I bet they get an uptick in signups, especially right after launching this design.
Re:Wikipedia’s Redesign Is Barely Noticeable. That’s the Point.
by kibwen on Thursday January 19, 2023 @12:05PM
(#34442678)
As mentioned in the above HN link, you don't need to log in. If you're annoyed by the logged-out approach of appending a query parameter to the URL, other people in sibling threads shared Greasemonkey scripts (or whatever they're called these days) for doing so automatically.