Re:OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 per Hour to Ma...
by Strom on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @08:15PM
(#34435502)
Your indentured slavery comment is a classic strawman and doesn't even apply. It's not a voluntary situation that someone signs up for.
Re:OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 per Hour to Ma...
by thaumasiotes on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @08:38PM
(#34435679)
> It's not a voluntary situation that someone signs up for.
Huh? That is in fact the normal state of indentured servitude. Slavery is also commonly a voluntary situation; that's the whole concept of "selling yourself into slavery".
> Until the late 18th century, indentured servitude was common in British America. It was often a way for Europeans to migrate to the American colonies: they signed an indenture in return for a costly passage.
Is indentured slavery exploitative? Your statement can be applied to indentured slaves unchanged. Exploitation cannot be justified by the fact that the victims lot has improved (see indentured slavery), or that the exploiter has their victims consent (see indentured slavery).
I'm speaking here as an SF Social Justice Warrior...who also is sub-Saharan Africa born and bred, and to whom poverty is no stranger.
When it comes to "overpaying" tech workers regardless of their location, HN mostly has unified praise as a job ought to be paid what it's worth[1], regardless of workers location; that principle should not stop at the borders of the United States, or limited to the middle-class. People labeling data for AI should be paid by their worth, and not by cost of living.
1. The fact that your comment is at the top bothers me a little due to hypocrisy. Smacks a little of "Location-independent-top-market income for me, but not for thee"