News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Salesforce, but for Dating by rytis on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @03:36PM (#34432708)
> combined with ChatGPT we could even make those automatic getting-back-in-touch messages indistinguishable from the manual ones

extending this bit further - we might as well reply with chatGPT. then it's chatGPT all the way down, who needs human interaction when we tick the boxes of "I called them" and "I replied"?.. :)

Re:Salesforce, but for Dating by MisterPea on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @03:45PM (#34432823)
This is exactly what happened in the show Silicon Valley with Dinesh and Gilfoyle's AI
Re:Salesforce, but for Dating by natpalmer1776 on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @05:12PM (#34433862)
In this situation, neither party need be aware that the other party is 'antisocial' in this regard. The way I see it, the following situations apply for a tool that produces communication indistinguishable from the user's own writing (AI)...

"AI" for the following cases would be beneficial:

Social -> Antisocial

Social <- Antisocial

"AI" for the following cases would be net neutral:

Antisocial -> Antisocial

Antisocial <- Antisocial

And finally "AI" would be inapplicable (since neither party would use it) in the following cases:

Social -> Social

Social <- Social

In this drastically simplified model, there aren't any cases where the existence of a sufficiently competent AI would be detrimental to any party involved, while still providing value for those who choose to use it.