News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitwarden Acquires Passwordless.dev by moogly on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @12:36PM (#34429928)
> The only part that was a slight hassle was buying a cert, creating an FQDN and making the DNS entries to get an SSL connection to the NAS

Note that Synology DSM has built-in Let's Encrypt support

Re:Bitwarden Acquires Passwordless.dev by vetinari on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @12:45PM (#34430086)
Unfortunately, HTTP challenge only. I.e. you have to open port 80 to your Synology, which is handled by the same nginx instance, as all the other services on the device.
Re:Bitwarden Acquires Passwordless.dev by chriscjcj on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @02:50PM (#34432038)
> Note that Synology DSM has built-in Let's Encrypt support

Yes... I tried going down that route. In my scenario, I'm accessing the NAS via its internal IP which is in an RFC1918 subnet. Let's Encrypt insists that you use a globally routable IP. If I used the public IP issed to me by my ISP, then I would have to map a port on my router and expose the NAS directly to the Internet. No way am I doing that.

I bought a cert through Namecheap and got 5 years for $29.95. That seemed quite reasonable to me. There was no problem getting it to work when I mapped the hostname to the NAS's internal IP. The only downside is that I have to go through a renewal process every year and install the updated cert on NAS. Not a huge deal; just one more thing I have to do.

Re:Bitwarden Acquires Passwordless.dev by moogly on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @03:06PM (#34432280)
That all makes sense. Wanted to point out to others that there's potentially less of a hassle to set this up (if you're fine with opening port 80, as has been pointed out to me).