Re:Wyoming wants to phase out sales of EVs by 2035
by rsj_hn on Sunday January 15, 2023 @02:39PM
(#34392471)
I gave multiple examples related to energy, education, environmental policy, crime, etc, and urged you to learn how to use a search engine to look up surveys. You fixated maniacally on not liking that the word "wall st" appeared in a blog title.
Cute.
You wouldn't happen to be from California, by any chance? I can see the ninja-like reading comprehension and reasoning skills are strong here.
Re:Wyoming wants to phase out sales of EVs by 2035
by mynameisvlad on Sunday January 15, 2023 @03:01PM
(#34392718)
I fixated on the provenance and methodology of the single source you provided.
Your opinions are, once again, just that. They’re not facts, regardless how convincing you try sounding. I’m not going to respond to them because I made my thoughts on them clear already. You’re entitled to them, but they’re not anything except that.
> You wouldn't happen to be from California, by any chance? I can see the ninja-like reading comprehension and reasoning skills are strong here.
I’m not, but nice ad hominem you tried there. Not that my words would be worth more or less based on where I live, but that clearly matters a lot to you.
It’s especially ridiculous since that’s literally just one organization’s opinion on California.
And their opinion is solely based on 4 key indicators and nothing else. I’m not a data scientist but even I know that you can pretty easily find 4 key metrics which allow you to rank states in any way you choose.
If you were to actually look up the organization, you would see it’s just a random blog (not that it is at all surprising considering their name), and that their 2021 rankings had California solidly in the middle of the pack, not that it makes a difference considering how limited their methodology is.
https://247wallst.com/special-report/2021/05/19/the-states-w...
Finally, just because you can’t think of any areas does not mean any don’t exist. You’ve made your opinions clear already.