News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FAA says computer failure was caused by 2 contractors who... by karmakaze on Saturday January 14, 2023 @12:11PM (#34381857)
There's no mention of deliberate circumvention. It doesn't even say there was circumvention, only that the files were damaged with the rules in place. If the rule is "don't damage these files when writing them" and it's your job to write them, it's adds no safety.

> Like other computer systems that are critical to operating flights, the FAA has imposed procedures to ensure data aren’t damaged by technicians working on them, said the person. The file or files were altered in spite of rules that prohibit those kind of changes on a live system.

> Agency officials are attempting to determine whether the two people made the changes accidentally or intentionally, and if there was any malicious intent, the person said.

Re:FAA says computer failure was caused by 2 contractors who... by ajross on Saturday January 14, 2023 @12:58PM (#34382265)
The lede reads, verbatim: "The computer failure that prompted a halt of all US flight departures was caused when a data file was damaged as a result of a failure to follow government procedures, the Federal Aviation Administration said Thursday."

It is clearly implied that had the rules been followed, the corruption wouldn't have occurred.

Your blame-the-FAA scenario where the rules were incomplete or flawed isn't ruled out, but I don't see value in asserting it without evidence. I think it's perfectly plausible that someone just cheated a bit. That's hardly a rare situation in any IT environment, and so it seems like Occam favors the article's interpretation.

Re:FAA says computer failure was caused by 2 contractors who... by peteradio on Saturday January 14, 2023 @01:28PM (#34382598)
Government defined rules, were they ever implemented in the org?