News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Docker 2.0 went from $11M to $135M in 2 years by ahepp on Friday January 13, 2023 @04:30PM (#34374153)
Docker uses container functionality specific to the Linux kernel. So on Linux, you can install a relatively lightweight engine. But on MacOS or Windows, you need to install the entire "Docker Desktop" app, which secretly spins up a Linux VM in the background, and presents a (pretty poor) abstraction as if this is all running on the host machine.
Re:Docker 2.0 went from $11M to $135M in 2 years by uberduper on Friday January 13, 2023 @05:34PM (#34374851)
docker-machine from brew sets up the linux vm using one of a few virtualization options. iirc I always used bhyve and never had to give it a second thought.
Re:Docker 2.0 went from $11M to $135M in 2 years by kaashif on Friday January 13, 2023 @07:01PM (#34375634)
On Windows, you don't really need to use Docker Desktop, I personally find it more convenient to run just plain old Docker in WSL. It's still a Linux VM, but you get more control over it.

I never understood what the point of Docker Desktop was on Windows if WSL exists.

Re:Docker 2.0 went from $11M to $135M in 2 years by CoolCold on Saturday January 14, 2023 @02:35PM (#34383337)
based on other comments here, there are cases when people like/need GUI part