Re:This is why I don't give you a job
by kenjackson on Saturday January 07, 2012 @11:50AM
(#3437359)
This assumes that there are a sufficient supply of men who can perform better than women.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
No, this assumes that there are not many women (or men for that matter) whose hyper-productivity can make up for a 2-3 year leave of absence.
Re:This is why I don't give you a job
by yummyfajitas on Saturday January 07, 2012 @01:08PM
(#3437597)
Not quite, because not every woman will vanish from work for 2-3 years.
Such laws make an employer indifferent between a man of quality Q and a woman of quality Q + P(taking leave) x (cost of leave). Whether or not hyper-productivity is required depends strongly on P(taking leave) and the cost of leave.