News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Genders.wtf by wpietri on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @07:42PM (#34347421)
For sure. And I think it's important to note that some of those definitions of racism are from people who others would see as beneficiaries of the system that the latter group sees as racist. That is to say, it shouldn't be surprising that as the power of whites declines, the definitions of racism they might prefer are coming under challenge.

Or in your terms of branding, it shouldn't be a shock that the dominant racial group would have established a definition of "racism" that is one more convenient to them than to the dominated groups, because that branding serves to prevent challenges to their power.

Re:Genders.wtf by gameman144 on Thursday January 12, 2023 @01:53PM (#34358572)
Totally agreed, every party in this whole debate definitely conforms to the idea that everyone's the protagonist in their own story.
Re:Genders.wtf by raxxorraxor on Monday January 16, 2023 @08:49AM (#34400599)
Of course. In the same way as some people may use a definition that justifies discrimination.