News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on NanoGPT. Parent comment

Re:NanoGPT by thomastjeffery on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @02:27PM (#34343268)
Intelligent but not conscious would still be a few steps ahead of GPT.

We can take a concept and refactor it symbolically. GPT can't do that. All it does is find symbols that are semantically close to other symbols.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NanoGPT by mansoon on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @10:21PM (#34348759)
I’m not sure that those two processes are as distinct as you believe them to be.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NanoGPT by thomastjeffery on Friday January 13, 2023 @09:41PM (#34376855)
You seem very sure they aren't, yet you have no evidence apart from your own belief that you might be correct.

That's circular reasoning.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:NanoGPT by mansoon on Saturday January 14, 2023 @12:30AM (#34377607)
Yup.
[ Parent | on HN ]