News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America’s roads and highways have a big, fat style guide by dv_dt on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @11:42AM (#34340502)
Individual states also have guidelines too (probably mostly aligned w/ the federal). It reminds me of the artist who wanted to correct a misleading fwy sign, pulled the style guide, made the sign and put it up.

https://thelandmag.com/richard-ankrom-guerrilla-public-servi...

Re:America’s roads and highways have a big, fat style guide by johnohara on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @01:43PM (#34342582)
The Artist: Richard Ankrom https://ankrom.org/

The Public Service: Guerrilla Public Service 2011 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Clgl63CWOkM

Re:America’s roads and highways have a big, fat style guide by familiartime on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @08:37PM (#34347917)
From a quick search, there are now sites like [0] where you can seemingly buy road signs which adhere to MUTCD (I can only imagine it was much more difficult for Ankrom in 2001). From the customer reviews, it sounds like many are placed within personal property, such as indoor decorations or arrows directing delivery drivers.

However, I wonder how much trouble people get in practice for putting up signs on less-trafficked public roads (e.g., signs like "Slow, children at play" or pedestrian crossings). I'd like to think that a well-intentioned sign on, say, a quiet suburban street would be allowed to exist.

[0] https://www.roadtrafficsigns.com/

Re:America’s roads and highways have a big, fat style guide by brewdad on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @11:14PM (#34349113)
Given that cities have removed guerrilla crosswalks painted by locals where crosswalks already legally existed, I would guess the sign would be short-lived once the right department found out about it.