We don't have any clear definitions for "creativity" to begin with. In practice, in these contexts, it seems to be defined as "whatever only humans can do" - that is, the goalposts are automatically moved with every AI advancement.
Re:NanoGPT
by cactusplant7374 on Thursday January 12, 2023 @06:13AM
(#34351913)
How could they be moved when they aren't even defined in the first place? Scientists don't even know where to begin when it comes to studying the mind and human consciousness.
But yes, scientists can look at your experiments and show that they don't have anything in common with human thought.
But my point, poorly explained, is that whatever ChatGPT is, it isn’t original or creative thought as a human would do it.
Chomsky’s example (which is based off Turing): Do submarines swim? Yes, they swim — if that’s what you mean by swimming.