News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NanoGPT by wnkrshm on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @06:34AM (#34337356)
Maybe it will be called GPT-XP by then, with Microsoft owning half of it.
Re:NanoGPT by awestroke on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @06:56AM (#34337484)
Or GPT-365
Re:NanoGPT by MikeDelta on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @07:19AM (#34337596)
Then they can bring back the talking paperclip, but this time actually useful.
Re:NanoGPT by generalizations on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @10:47AM (#34339737)
It could actually work. It would be an incredibly gutsy move and I love it, and they'd probably earn a lot of respect. They’d get so much press for it. And if it held up, it’d probably be one of the things that MS is remembered for.
Re:NanoGPT by wut42 on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @08:13AM (#34337993)
Or GPT One.
Re:NanoGPT by int_19h on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @05:59PM (#34346316)
Why not ask GPT itself what it wants to be called?
Re:NanoGPT by belter on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @08:47AM (#34338362)
Looking forward to see GPT-4 recommending Linux and Libre Office instead of Windows/Office as the logical choice out of 250 IQ ML Model...
Re:NanoGPT by taneq on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @09:26AM (#34338797)
GPT-10 will be evergreen and 'the last version of GPT'.

And then three years later GPT-11 will be required to run the latest games.

Re:NanoGPT by ben_w on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @10:24AM (#34339439)
In my imagination, OpenAI does what Bungie did when MS bought them, and open-sources what used to be their crown jewels.

That said, GPT-AlephOne only makes sense if there's a preceding GPT-∞.

Re:NanoGPT by egorfine on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @10:26AM (#34339463)
They have got to release GPT-3.11 For Workgroups first.