News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Open Letter on the Open Gaming License, to Wizards of ... by the_af on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @10:41PM (#34334765)
To be honest I think I managed to confuse myself. But that's because I think everyone is conflating everything in this case.

Some people seem to think the OGL is the "blood" of these third party companies, without which their business model doesn't exist. Surprisingly -- but I have trouble believing this -- some think OGL-licensed games are at risk even if they are unrelated to the D&D franchise and its gameplay mechanics (I hope this is just a misunderstanding!).

But let's say this is just legalese. Does it seem wise to let your core product be sold under contractual terms defined by your direct business competitor, which by their own admission has no interest in "funding the competition"? (they've been quoted saying this).

Re:An Open Letter on the Open Gaming License, to Wizards of ... by lmm on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @12:48AM (#34335428)
> But let's say this is just legalese. Does it seem wise to let your core product be sold under contractual terms defined by your direct business competitor, which by their own admission has no interest in "funding the competition"? (they've been quoted saying this).

I think it's probably fine. Like, if WotC is willing to sell their product on these terms, it's probably safe for me to sell my product on the same terms, especially if we're direct competitors. Obviously there's a risk, but there's a risk in not competing too. Compare price matching.