Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw...
by spankalee on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @03:53PM
(#34331311)
Or _why_
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw...
by Izkata on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:08PM
(#34334916)
That's what the commit message that added that test is for. And an example of why I'm strongly against squashing commits.
Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw...
by dllthomas on Wednesday January 11, 2023 @01:16PM
(#34342134)
For a while now I've been dreaming about a system that lets me link tests to documentation. In a similar way that citations of other documents support claims in many domains, claims about software could be backed up by tests that demonstrate the claim. Then, when a test fails, the system could surface the relevant pieces of documentation (whether they're developer facing or user facing) so the developer knows the _why_ they're trying to preserve as they update some combination of the code, the test, and the documentation.
Re:Theory-building and why employee churn is lethal to softw...
by andrewfong on Thursday January 12, 2023 @01:18AM
(#34349874)
I'd guess you could get pretty far by just adding comments with links to product specs, JIRA tickets, or Slack/chat threads, as applicable.