News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What’s New in Go 1.20, Part I: Language Changes by tgv on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:35AM (#34324618)
> new slice to array conversions

I expect this to bite a few people in places they didn't know could hurt. Better grep your code for slice-to-array conversion.

Re:What’s New in Go 1.20, Part I: Language Changes by martisch on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:49AM (#34324786)
Note that afaik [3]string(s) was not valid before go1.20 so no existing code should use it. The semantic equivalent had to be written as *(*[3]string)(s) which also copies the array pointed to by *[3]string)(s). The new notation is basically a shorthand and easier to discover than using *(*[3]string)(s): https://github.com/golang/go/issues/46505
Re:What’s New in Go 1.20, Part I: Language Changes by tgv on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @08:59AM (#34324894)
Right. It was not a well-formed conversion. My bad.
Re:What’s New in Go 1.20, Part I: Language Changes by zamadatix on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:11AM (#34327043)
Also particular note from the linked general release notes:

> Go 1.20 is the last release that will run on any release of Windows 7, 8, Server 2008 and Server 2012. Go 1.21 will require at least Windows 10 or Server 2016.

Windows 7 Extended Security Updates ending today expect to see that across a lot of software.

Re:What’s New in Go 1.20, Part I: Language Changes by earthboundkid on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @12:44PM (#34328538)
Title isn't great because this is just one part about the language changes, not standard library changes.
Re:What’s New in Go 1.20, Part I: Language Changes by greatgib on Tuesday January 10, 2023 @11:58PM (#34335171)
Is it just me or go looks like more and more brainfuck language after each new version?