- retribution (revenge)
- deterrence
- rehabilitation
- incapacitation (they can't re-offend if they're in prison or dead)
In these sort of discussions about justice online, the first is often cast as illegitimate, the second as impossible, the third as the gold standard, and the fourth is frequently ignored completely.
Few people ever defend retribution, so I will here. Many people who are victims of crimes have a desire to see retribution done. If the government does not play at least some lip service to the desire for retribution, then more people will take it into their own hands. They'll seek vigilante justice. Vigilante justice is dangerous to society because it's often capricious and disproportionate. It is better for governments to sate the desire for retribution using official processes which can be checked with safeguards, such as trials.
If that were the case, we'd see significantly higher amounts of "vigilante justice" in countries that have abolished the death penalty, right?
I think "vigilante justice" is more often than not "vigilante policing", when people believe criminals aren't being sufficiently investigated and arrested, not when people believe criminals aren't being sufficiently executed
No. The death penalty is not the only way to satisfy this nature.
- special prevention
- general prevention (=deterrence)
- revenge