Re:Game prototype using AI assisted graphics
by panzerboiler on Sunday January 08, 2023 @01:12PM
(#34301491)
No difference at all. Let's read books written by an AI. Play games designed and coded by an AI. Enjoy art painted by an AI. Debate with an AI on the internet. Listen to music composed and performed by an AI. Pretty soon, let's watch movies directed, edited and played by an AI. In the process, let's give the same AI also all the prompts, so it can learn what we want to read, play, enjoy, listen to and watch. Let's remove ourselves from the whole picture. Enjoy decay.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Game prototype using AI assisted graphics
by bavell on Sunday January 08, 2023 @02:34PM
(#34302277)
Yeah, this is the direction I worry about. Why bother being creative when the AIs "do it better"? How many people will bother paying for human art when AIs "do it better"? Will human creativity be relegated to a tiny niche in a sea of AI content? Will this all but erase paid human art except for highly specialized and narrow niches? Am I too pessimistic?
Re:Game prototype using AI assisted graphics
by hexomancer on Sunday January 08, 2023 @05:10PM
(#34303752)
Computers have been playing chess way better than humans for many years, yet it has not prevented people from playing chess and enjoying it. Also human chess game have way more viewers than computer games despite objectively being lower quality.