News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Riddle solved: Why was Roman concrete so durable? by naniwaduni on Friday January 06, 2023 @05:11PM (#34282003)
The problem with making people slow down is that it slows people down.
Re:Riddle solved: Why was Roman concrete so durable? by r00fus on Friday January 06, 2023 @07:54PM (#34283700)
Re:Riddle solved: Why was Roman concrete so durable? by naniwaduni on Saturday January 07, 2023 @12:20PM (#34290234)
But usually, it slows people down.

> In 2012, Paul Lecroart, of the institute of planning and development of the Île-de-France, wrote that "Despite initial fears, the removal of main roads does not cause deterioration of traffic conditions beyond the starting adjustments. The traffic transfer are limited and below expectations".[4] He also notes that some private vehicle trips (and related economic activity) are not transferred to public transport and simply disappear ("evaporate").[4]

> The same phenomenon was also observed when road closing was not part of an urban project but the consequence of an accident. In 2012 in Rouen, a bridge was destroyed by fire. Over the next two years, other bridges were used more, but the total number of cars crossing bridges was reduced.[4]

It seems a lot like the real-world examples of the phenomenon look like close cousins of "if you remove the smallest values in a set, the average goes up".