News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT Creator Is in Talks for Tender Offer That Would V... by metadat on Thursday January 05, 2023 @04:35PM (#34267018)
Musk impregnated an OpenAI engineer last year [0]. What kind of separation is that?

[0] https://www.theverge.com/2022/7/7/23198199/elon-musk-childre...

Re:ChatGPT Creator Is in Talks for Tender Offer That Would V... by bink on Thursday January 05, 2023 @06:10PM (#34268317)
I'm not sure that counts as a "stake". He did found the company so I'm sure he still has connections there.
Re:ChatGPT Creator Is in Talks for Tender Offer That Would V... by gwern on Thursday January 05, 2023 @07:01PM (#34268884)
He didn't found OpenAI-the-company which was owned by the OpenAI-the-501(c)3-charity & which has sold off 'capped returns' parts of it, he co-founded the charity, and he left the OpenAI charity a long time ago after having stepped back a lot before that as well. There has been no reporting about him buying a stake in the company the charity owns, and it seems a little unlikely they would want him investing either. So Elon Musk's travails would appear to be largely unrelated to anything going on at either OpenAI-the-company or its parent OpenAI-the-charity.
Re:ChatGPT Creator Is in Talks for Tender Offer That Would V... by metadat on Thursday January 05, 2023 @09:14PM (#34270080)
Very clever use of the word travail. Was the irony intentional, gwern? (See the tail end of the definitions ;)

travail noun

tra·vail tr-vāl tra-vāl

1a: work especially of a painful or laborious nature : TOIL

1b: a physical or mental exertion or piece of work : TASK, EFFORT

1c: AGONY, TORMENT

2a: LABOR, CHILDBIRTH

Re:ChatGPT Creator Is in Talks for Tender Offer That Would V... by gwern on Wednesday January 18, 2023 @11:24PM (#34436677)
(Less than intentional, more than accidental. I know the multiple meanings, so it came easily to mind by priming. That sort of unintentional wordplay is a bit of a bad habit, really, when it leads you to use obsolete vocab - the other day someone was asking me if I had made a typo for 'way' when I wrote 'X is in some wise deficient'. I didn't, but it's not like I was trying to be clear either.)