Re:Caltech to Launch Space Solar Power Technology Demo into ...
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday January 05, 2023 @02:09PM
(#34264874)
> technology which only makes sense in that economic context is very limited
If this were a start-up I’d be roundly criticising it. It’s not. It’s a research project. And each of its sub-projects—testing new PVs in space, a novel deployment mechanism, power transmission—has clear value outside a space-based solar context.
As a focussing mechanism, SBSP is neat because each problem needing to be solved to make it economically viable is immediately valuable on the ground. (Save for power transmission. That’s still niche.)
Re:Caltech to Launch Space Solar Power Technology Demo into ...
by LarryMullins on Thursday January 05, 2023 @02:19PM
(#34265024)
> Save for power transmission
Isn't that the entire point? Putting solar panels in space has been done regularly the 1950s.
Re:Caltech to Launch Space Solar Power Technology Demo into ...
by JumpCrisscross on Thursday January 05, 2023 @02:39PM
(#34265345)
I meant that I don't see a near-term use terrestrial use case for better microwave power transmission.
Re:Caltech to Launch Space Solar Power Technology Demo into ...
by LarryMullins on Thursday January 05, 2023 @02:46PM
(#34265457)
Maybe you could use microwave power transmission (from the ground) to power atmospheric pseudo-satellites, but practical applications seem dubious.
Re:Caltech to Launch Space Solar Power Technology Demo into ...
by ben_w on Thursday January 05, 2023 @03:06PM
(#34265736)
Drones. Electric aircraft in general, recharging continuously in-flight.
Might be ill-advised for a whole mass of reasons that I, as a software engineer, know naught of; but it would be a use case.
The economics of anything on Mars or the Moon amounts to 'try to convince a government to throw tons of money at you.' A technology which only makes sense in that economic context is very limited.