AUTOMATIC1111's GitHub Account Suspended For "TOS Violations"

Re:AUTOMATIC1111's GitHub Account Suspended For "TOS Violati... by sshine on Thursday January 05, 2023 @07:04AM (#34258606)

Disclaimer: I don't understand the context; I'm simply commenting on https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1020158613093892256/1...:

> [...] nsfw [...] on all fours [...] balls [...] penis between paws [...]

He got banned for sex prompting?

> [...] disfigured face, missing eyes, missing limbs [...] 2 toes, 3 toes [...]

Okay, okay... maybe GitHub isn't the place for popularising gore porn generators, but...

> [...] child, young [...]

Ah.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AUTOMATIC1111's GitHub Account Suspended For "TOS Violati... by doctor_eval on Thursday January 05, 2023 @07:16AM (#34258685)

I know nothing at all about prompt engineering but I think those words were negative prompts intended to ensure those things don’t emerge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AUTOMATIC1111's GitHub Account Suspended For "TOS Violati... by sshine on Thursday January 05, 2023 @07:17AM (#34258700)

It seems that you know more than me.

Thank you for clarifying.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AUTOMATIC1111's GitHub Account Suspended For "TOS Violati... by KarlKode on Thursday January 05, 2023 @07:24AM (#34258746)

Did you miss that the child stuff is explicitly mentioned as negative prompt (which I assume is used to let the network know that you don't want those traits in the output image)?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AUTOMATIC1111's GitHub Account Suspended For "TOS Violati... by sshine on Friday January 06, 2023 @12:17PM (#34277633)

I didn't know what a negative prompt is.

I've used my ignorance as an opportunity for others to better interpret this also.

[ Parent | on HN ]