News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Microsoft and OpenAI Working on ChatGPT-Powered Bing in Challenge to Google. Parent comment

Re:Microsoft and OpenAI Working on ChatGPT-Powered Bing in C... by loudmax on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @09:42AM (#34245998)
This isn't exactly an endorsement of ChatGPT, but a lot of human reasoning follows that approximate logic.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft and OpenAI Working on ChatGPT-Powered Bing in C... by datavirtue on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @09:52AM (#34246135)
Forget all that accuracy and misinformation nonsense, if you aren't using chatGPT to write your boilerplate for you, you're doing it wrong. New best friend.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft and OpenAI Working on ChatGPT-Powered Bing in C... by foobarbecue on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @10:01AM (#34246250)
Don't you like your boilerplate to be correct?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft and OpenAI Working on ChatGPT-Powered Bing in C... by krona on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @10:23AM (#34246565)
Depends who'll be reading it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Microsoft and OpenAI Working on ChatGPT-Powered Bing in C... by foobarbecue on Wednesday January 04, 2023 @12:42PM (#34248781)
Ah, right. I was thinking of code boilerplate, but I'm reminded that boilerplate is also a thing in beaurocratic documents.

Edit: and PhDs. I was forced to include redundant introductions and background sections to the chapters in mine. That material, which probably was about 30% of the document, probably could have been generated by ChatGPT just fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]