News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Year of C++ Successor Languages by masklinn on Monday January 02, 2023 @11:10AM (#34219491)
> Signaling to caller has already been shown to be a complete mistake with java checked exceptions

It's not signalling which has been shown to be a complete mistake, but checked exceptions, more specifically as implemented by Java.

Signalling works just fine and is actually rather enjoyable when done well.

Re:The Year of C++ Successor Languages by kllrnohj on Monday January 02, 2023 @12:01PM (#34220259)
Can you point to an example? What has "signaled exceptions"?
Re:The Year of C++ Successor Languages by masklinn on Saturday January 07, 2023 @06:06AM (#34287042)
> Can you point to an example?

Rust, Swift, Erlang, Haskell, ...

> What has "signaled exceptions"?

Java.

It's not clear what you're asking.

My comment noted that signalling the possibility of errors to caller (in general) is valuable.

jcelerier objected with java's checked exceptions as a counter-example, as they signal to the caller, but they're shit.

However that's not a counter example, that's just java's checked exceptions being a shitty implementation of the idea.