News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Resolutions for programmers by vacri on Tuesday January 03, 2012 @04:42PM (#3421438)
Colemak is supposed to perform slightly better then Dvorak as a layout, and be easier to learn for a qwerty typist.

http://colemak.com/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboard_layout#Colemak

Re:Resolutions for programmers by yoos on Tuesday January 03, 2012 @11:31PM (#3422755)
Second vote for Colemak here! I spent the first two of my high school years in Japan essentially being homeschooled. I had developed shoulder pain and a ganglion cyst in my wrist due to lots of typing and playing tennis, so I took the opportunity to try both Dvorak and Colemak.

I used to average 110 wpm on Qwerty. I started at 30 wpm Colemak and reached 80 in three months. After fourish years, I'm back at 110 wpm, with no more cyst or shoulder pain.

I tried Dvorak for a week but disliked that 1) it emphasizes hand alternation (as opposed to Colemak's emphasis on finger mashes) and 2) it was so difficult to type "ls -l".

Re:Resolutions for programmers by vacri on Wednesday January 04, 2012 @02:32AM (#3423205)
I haven't actually tried an alternate keyboard layout yet so I can't vouch for it, but Colemak seems to have the edge on Dvorak.

I also do the ls -l thing all the time and finally succumbed to just uncommenting the relevant alias in my .bash_rc. 'll' just makes it easier; I don't know why I resisted enabling the alias...

Re:Resolutions for programmers by fady on Tuesday January 03, 2012 @04:49PM (#3421467)
thanks for the link vacri!