Re:Dropping Adsense - Saying Goodbye to $100K Per Year in Ea...
by nazgulnarsil on Friday October 24, 2008 @02:28AM
(#342140)
I actually think that a siesta type biphasic pattern is much healthier for long term (better than monophasic too). But I also think polyphasic can be a major productivity booster for 3-6 months.
But even if you do, it doesn't seem possible for a human to work 100% of the time. Each time I've tried, I simply end up wasting time rather than using it -- e.g. I'll stare at my computer screen for awhile thinking, try some minor change that doesn't work, then repeat the cycle over for a couple hours. And the next day, my work has often proved to be shoddy at best when I was forcing myself to work.
On the other hand, I've had plenty of experiences that went like: There's a bug to fix. Can't seem to fix it. Go to bed. Wake up refreshed. Spot the bug in ten minutes.
That seems pretty valuable as a time saver, so it doesn't seem wise to sacrifice your "unwind" time lightly.
I'm sorry. I don't mean to sound like I'm coming down on you. I'm merely trying to point out that, in the end, polyphasic sleep seems like a form of masochism -- and perhaps that's why Steve himself stopped doing it.