News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by tromp on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:05PM (#34210855)
Loss of his bitcoin is not yet confirmed.

It's possible that only his twitter account got hacked, and the hacker is having some fun with it.

Beyond being a bitcoin core dev [1], Luke-Jr is also the author of an independent node and wallet implementation known as Bitcoin Knots [2].

[1] https://github.com/luke-jr

[2] https://bitcoinknots.org/

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by yuvadam on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:21PM (#34211056)
Peter Todd claims he has confirmation [1]

[1] - https://twitter.com/peterktodd/status/1609655629903265795

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by gjsman-1000 on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:24PM (#34211094)
If a Bitcoin Developer with >$3M in Bitcoin didn’t use a hardware wallet… God help the typical Bitcoin user. It’s a tragedy, and inexcusable.
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by horsawlarway on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:36PM (#34211227)
fraud and reconciliation are fundamental in our finance systems. To claim this as anything other than a failing of bitcoin as a whole is "inexcusable".
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by meltyness on Sunday January 01, 2023 @05:00PM (#34211468)
I still get butterflies thinking about the clever beauty of the great network, computer, software, cryptographic security piñata in the sky.

It means that rather than being a story about public affairs, snake oils, and conspiracies -- security is now a legitimate business concern.

I won't pretend to have an endgame, but I really don't see too much to loathe. Even the most vehement concerns are easily reframed as opportunity.

- Unsuspecting public? To contrast crypto with the system not many people's personal financial planning involves bounding correlations between News Sentiment -> VVIX -> VIX -> Derivatives market -> Volatile inflation across all sectors.

- Security concerns? Again, this slaps a price tag, and hence quantifiable risk-level on every computer system security level -- airgapped? networked? It's practically its own insurance, on software that is still centuries away from being closed-form auditable.

- Proof of work? Global governments cooperate to limit, minimize, control power usage. Not such a bad thing in that light, the power system could use more care and engineering as it is.

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by lizknope on Sunday January 01, 2023 @06:37PM (#34212389)
The centralized authority of credit card companies etc that can reverse fraudulent transactions are one of the major reasons for the success of credit cards.

Bitcoin sees this centralization as a bug and the inability to reverse transactions is a feature.

Why do crypto bros only want the government to step in when they LOSE money???

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by SilasX on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:34PM (#34211208)
Gavin Andresen, a lead Bitcoin developer, sent me a 10 BTC donation ($3000 at the time) when he meant to send $10 worth of BTC.

Yes, I refunded.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14720921

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by hgsgm on Sunday January 01, 2023 @05:33PM (#34211785)
Great example of how "Bitcoin is trustless" means "Bitcoin only works is the trust is provided externally".
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by 323 on Sunday January 01, 2023 @06:42PM (#34212424)
It's not just Goodness of heart. This case can fall under existing laws. You are not allowed to keep obvious transfer mistakes like these.
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by ipython on Sunday January 01, 2023 @08:29PM (#34213163)
Who would enforce this? The Bitcoin police?
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by hgsgm on Sunday January 01, 2023 @09:12PM (#34213429)
Right, that's "trust" being provided by the legal climate.
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by adql on Monday January 02, 2023 @11:34AM (#34219854)
Yeah in banking law, there is no bitcoin bank...
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by tmpburning on Sunday January 01, 2023 @05:44PM (#34211875)
I host my Bitcoins publicly as a gpg encrypted file
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by fortysixdegrees on Sunday January 01, 2023 @10:43PM (#34214015)
Cool. Link?
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by tmpburning on Monday January 02, 2023 @01:12PM (#34221380)
I'll email it to you, if you provide an email address.
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by dibt on Sunday January 01, 2023 @07:19PM (#34212702)
A Bitcoin dev has a higher threat profile than the average person. if only because it would be assumed he had many bitcoin in self-custody. Many things we do as a 'nobody' would get us compromised if our threat profile were a littler higher.

He made it worse by being so public, and hosting his own (publicly known) servers.

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by urza on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:16PM (#34210996)
It looks like it is just twitter hack. The wording in those tweets doesn't fit Luke's writing style.

This is his mastodon, let's see if he posts anything there:

https://bitcoinhackers.org/@lukedashjr

Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by theCrowing on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:20PM (#34211038)
You believe that someone keeps their normal "writing style" when his livelihood gets stolen? :>
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by urza on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:24PM (#34211097)
I have my doubts that he would keep much in hot wallet. That would be.. weird. But I might be wrong of course, let's wait for some confirmation.
Re:Top Bitcoin dev gets owned by optimalsolver on Sunday January 01, 2023 @04:34PM (#34211206)
So your assertion that "It looks like it is just twitter hack" was based on a gut-feeling. You should probably have made that clearer.