Re:“Internet in Space” Will Transform the Satellite Imagery ...
by m2fkxy on Sunday January 01, 2023 @03:59PM
(#34210803)
SAR typically are in sun-synchronous orbits too, but mostly for power management reasons. difference is, of course, that they do not need to have their ascending node in daylight.
the only SAR constellations I know aren't in SSO are Israeli (due to launch geometry constraints) and NRO's birds (LACROS/ONYX/TOPAZ, whatever their names are) [1]. some of them have exotic retrograde orbits [2].
[1] see e.g. https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/onyx.htm
[2] see e.g. https://spaceflight101.com/delta-iv-nrol-47/nrol-47/
Re:“Internet in Space” Will Transform the Satellite Imagery ...
by campchase on Sunday January 01, 2023 @09:49PM
(#34213675)
Best comment in the thread, I knew about Onyx but nothing more than the Wikipedia page (hardly anything)
Re:“Internet in Space” Will Transform the Satellite Imagery ...
by ericd on Sunday January 01, 2023 @08:52PM
(#34213294)
Why is it a problem that it's not in sun-synchronous orbit? That just means that only a fraction will be usable at any given time? It seems like they have massive redundancy to make up for the lack of specialization?
Put simply, it's MUCH easier and cheaper to build one type of satellite that does one task very well than it is to do two tasks poorly.