News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Why did stack-based CPUs lose out? by afiori on Sunday January 01, 2023 @03:27AM (#34204665)
Not an expert but essentially radiations can produce electrons in random places flipping one or more transistors unexpectedly.

Larger transistors need more electrons so they are slightly more resistant.

Re:Ask HN: Why did stack-based CPUs lose out? by denton-scratch on Sunday January 01, 2023 @07:50AM (#34205909)
Because larger transistors need more electrons, they also need more power to switch. I guess that circuitry made from valves/vacuum tubes might provide high radiation resistance?
Re:Ask HN: Why did stack-based CPUs lose out? by ilyt on Sunday January 01, 2023 @11:17AM (#34207564)
I mean, you could just use big transistors
Re:Ask HN: Why did stack-based CPUs lose out? by geomark on Sunday January 01, 2023 @10:23AM (#34206985)
That's single event upset (SEU). The other radiation issue is total dose. That's when charge gradually builds up in insulating gates due to ionizing radiation. It's permanent, and eventually reaches the point that the transistor is always on so has a permanent fault. One of the factors is collection area, so larger gates are not less susceptible because they have a larger collection area. But if they run at a higher voltage that can make them more tolerant to total dose.
Re:Ask HN: Why did stack-based CPUs lose out? by ilyt on Sunday January 01, 2023 @11:17AM (#34207559)
THe other problem is that it can bump the atoms permanently off the silicon lattice, so permanent damage. Bigger transistor can just survive more hits