Of course i could be wrong but you seem to contradict yourself in your first reply (You claimed new landlord policies were paramount, then that you were talking about primary residence ownership where landlordship wouldnt apply?).

You then said primary home ownership is a ponzi scheme which I gave an example as to why that seems untrue. I might be wrong here but providing a counter argument supporting why renting should be preferential to home ownership financially would be helpful as that seems superficially untrue.