News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by jsjohnst on Friday December 30, 2022 @09:49PM (#34192993)
But if it were that simple, couldn’t a provider have a page (say /canary/<user>.txt) that makes a similar attestation on a per user minute by minute basis, thus directly disclosing not just that there was a warrant, but for who? If the legal basis is protection against compelled speech, then logically that should be “ok” as the government “can’t” compel you to update it. I realize this is question is bordering on reductio ad absurdum, but not intentionally.
Re: by devmor on Saturday December 31, 2022 @10:12AM (#34197095)
If you were manually updating said document, sure. The government can't compel your speech...

But if you had a script doing so, which is likely the case, you would have to modify it or direct it to stop updating, which would be a violation again.

Re: by jsjohnst on Saturday December 31, 2022 @12:48PM (#34198782)
> If you were manually updating said document, sure.

I don’t think it’ll be that cut and dry as others have stated articulately.

> The government can't compel your speech

That’s not true. The United States government can compel your speech, albeit in very limited cases.