Re:
by jsjohnst on Friday December 30, 2022 @09:49PM
(#34192993)
But if it were that simple, couldn’t a provider have a page (say /canary/<user>.txt) that makes a similar attestation on a per user minute by minute basis, thus directly disclosing not just that there was a warrant, but for who? If the legal basis is protection against compelled speech, then logically that should be “ok” as the government “can’t” compel you to update it. I realize this is question is bordering on reductio ad absurdum, but not intentionally.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
If you were manually updating said document, sure. The government can't compel your speech...
But if you had a script doing so, which is likely the case, you would have to modify it or direct it to stop updating, which would be a violation again.
> If you were manually updating said document, sure.
I don’t think it’ll be that cut and dry as others have stated articulately.
> The government can't compel your speech
That’s not true. The United States government can compel your speech, albeit in very limited cases.