Photosynthesis only uses a subset of the visible spectrum. PV panels make power using a different (larger? certainly non-identical) subset of the visible spectrum, albeit at a maximum of maybe 30% efficiency in practice. At first glance, if solar panels convert enough unused parts of the spectrum into LED output that can drive photosynthesis, there might be a net gain on crop yield per m² versus traditional farming. I'm sure someone's run this experiment by now. If so, I'd be curious to see the results.
Incidentally, PV panels discard IR light which makes up 55% of all received solar energy. Concentrated solar power systems seem theoretically more efficient per m² since they capture all light as heat, but I imagine maintenance, energy storage, and heat engine/dynamo inefficiencies combine to bring their total efficiency down.
In short, back of the napkin calculations for this stuff are harder than they may seem! I'd love to see the results of some real-world experiments.
As I understand the variation in green light and it’s intensity mucks up photosynthesis, now if photosynthesis could be tuned to use green light too that would be handy, it’s just that evolution has a head start of billions of years.
Of course though eukaryotic cells run on mitochondria, if energy could be sourced to the cell to replace the chloroplasts directly that could be one way around. But denaturing food like that could have unforeseen consequences.
There was a Tommorow’s World item about making food from petrochemicals, I’m still aghast.
You make that sound so bad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-cell_protein
Imagine the potential... ;->