News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ChatGPT Political Compass by bombolo on Friday December 30, 2022 @03:46AM (#34183215)
rms called epstin a "serial rapist"…

> Here’s a particularly awful direct quote:

So, if I understand you correctly, you'd be ok with rape if it was not against the law?

Re:ChatGPT Political Compass by bitwize on Friday December 30, 2022 @05:11AM (#34183654)
The journalist's cheatcode: "So what you're saying is..."
Re:ChatGPT Political Compass by jakelazaroff on Friday December 30, 2022 @09:52AM (#34185539)
If you’re gonna make a bad faith interpretation of my comment like that, you need to make it sound more plausible.

Here’s what I’m actually saying: it is morally absurd to define rape in a way that excludes an adult in their 50s having sex with a 17 year old. Just so you understand me correctly.

Re:ChatGPT Political Compass by bombolo on Friday December 30, 2022 @10:44AM (#34186043)
> If you’re gonna make a bad faith interpretation of my comment like that, you need to make it sound more plausible.

Yes this sort of things feels bad when it happens to us… which is ironic because you were ok doing it to someone else :)

> Here’s what I’m actually saying: it is morally absurd to define rape in a way that excludes an adult in their 50s having sex with a 17 year old

He was arguing against the fact that statutory rape in USA is a boolean value basically.

You are making it sound like rape is legal if it happens to someone old… when in fact rape is always illegal.