News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Identify a Scientific Fact by jll29 on Thursday December 29, 2022 @09:03PM (#34180868)
> Do not mistake "useful" for "true."

As far as theories are concerned, "useful" means "makes valid predictions", so true, but within a limited scope (Newtonian physics: macroscopic events, from a human perspective).

Re:How to Identify a Scientific Fact by Jack_Hacker on Thursday December 29, 2022 @09:42PM (#34181168)
If we take QM seriously, there's nothing stopping it from affecting macroscopic events from a human perspective. A cannonball whose trajectory was planned in accordance with Newtonian physics could suddenly and unexpectedly move three feet to the left, it's just ridiculously unlikely.[0] This isn't a piecewise function where Newtonian physics is true within some constraints of speed and scale, Newtonian physics is simply wrong and useful.

[0]: Under the Everett interpretation, which is no more or less scientific than the Copenhagen interpretation, this happens all the time and is witnessed by many humans.