What Can We Learn from Barnes and Noble's Surprising Turnaround?

Re:What Can We Learn from Barnes and Noble's Surprising Turn... by isopede on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @08:02PM (#34168201)

There already has been. The relevant case law is LLC v ReDigi:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitol_Records,_LLC_v._ReDigi....

> On March 30, 2013, Judge Richard J. Sullivan ruled in favor of Capitol Records, explaining that the transfer of digital data from one storage medium to another constituted a violation of copyright, because the copy was ultimately an unauthorized reproduction, and therefore outside of the protection of the first-sale doctrine

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What Can We Learn from Barnes and Noble's Surprising Turn... by bubblethink on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @08:08PM (#34168246)

>claimed copyright infringement against ReDigi, a service that allows resale of digital music tracks originally purchased from the iTunes Store

AKA distribution. Without distribution, the owner cannot claim damages. So making your own copy for your own use does not fall under this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What Can We Learn from Barnes and Noble's Surprising Turn... by hotcoffeebear on Thursday December 29, 2022 @06:48AM (#34171708)

Yeah. That’s the reason for DJs there is a license for “working copy” (bastard SIAE), especially if you’re downloading digitally and copying it to usb disk. If you are playing vinyl, they can suck my tonearm!

[ Parent | on HN ]