Re:Rogue geoengineering startup attempts to affect atmospher...
by dotancohen on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @05:21AM
(#34159460)
Why not? Society still considers expelling CO2 and NO2 into the atmosphere as 'normal'. Maybe the outrage directed at this effort should be directed at the industries expelling CO2 and NO2 as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rogue geoengineering startup attempts to affect atmospher...
by hef19898 on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @06:05AM
(#34159761)
NOx led to the VW emissions scandal, so we take the quite serious. CO2, well, we should be more aggressive, but it is tackled, e,g, no new ICE cars in the EU after 2035 (?). I still remember dead forests due to acid rain, caused by various sulfur-based shit in the atmosphere, we got rid of that. Same for some of the ozone layer destroyers, we got rid of those, too. That it takes longer to get rid of that crap shouldn't be used to accept start-ups intentionally (as opposed to being a side effect like other industries) polluting, and promoting that, as PR stunts and funding vehicles. Especially since the latter can be so easily stopped.
Re:Rogue geoengineering startup attempts to affect atmospher...
by swader999 on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @06:32AM
(#34159968)
Well there's breathing, is that not normal?
Re:Rogue geoengineering startup attempts to affect atmospher...
by dotancohen on Wednesday December 28, 2022 @06:48AM
(#34160067)
Presumably there exist multiple organism that live in a balance, some emitting CO2 and other absorbing it. Being a productive member of an ecosystem is fine, but flooding that ecosystem with excessive emissions is not.