News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Letter regarding proposed free expression statement from MIT. Parent comment

Re:Letter regarding proposed free expression statement from MIT by P5fRxh5kUvp2th on Monday December 26, 2022 @05:15AM (#34136350)
It amazes me that so many people think trying to refute an example refutes the point. It doesn't, replace social with pack in my comment and move on if you must.

The rest of your post is just trashy thinking. If you believe the ratio of men to women is not due to personal choice, that's a claim YOU need to back up. I don't have to back up the assumption that it's personal choice, especially against someone who is, when you boil it all down, saying that it _IS_ personal choice, but that they were manipulated into that personal choice.

Where is all the angst over the lack of female loggers?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Letter regarding proposed free expression statement from MIT by dagmx on Monday December 26, 2022 @10:54AM (#34138648)
There is angst over the lack of female loggers. I don’t know why you think there isn’t?

This exists for all trades. Logging just isn’t that visible to most people so it’s not one that’s brought up as often.

You’re conflating many many points in your arguments. You also have yet to say why you think people are drawn to certain trades but keep expecting others to put up more and more evidence.

[ Parent | on HN ]