Re:Letter regarding proposed free expression statement from MIT
by morjom on Monday December 26, 2022 @01:41AM
(#34135336)
Couldn't "psychological harm/turmoil" fit somewhere in there aswell? Verbal abuse etc.
Re:Letter regarding proposed free expression statement from MIT
by P5fRxh5kUvp2th on Monday December 26, 2022 @04:37AM
(#34136143)
generally speaking that would fall under harassment.
Re:Letter regarding proposed free expression statement from MIT
by icedistilled on Monday December 26, 2022 @01:37AM
(#34135314)
>"Because speech doesn’t cause physical harm or loss to others."
Nope, that is trivially wrong with the obvious counter examples being slander and libel.
Because speech doesn’t cause physical harm or loss to others.