News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Life Is Short (2016) by watwut on Sunday December 25, 2022 @04:37AM (#34125685)
This is not true. Humans died on injuries and sickness that are easily treatable now. They used to be more frequent and deadly.

Humans got frequently born with disabilities because malnutrition in pregnancy (like a lack of iodine) that just don't happen anymore in West.

There were whole classes of these issues that killed people and just don't exist anymore.

Re:Life Is Short (2016) by jaakl on Sunday December 25, 2022 @06:14AM (#34126225)
In the other hand they were not dying from technology induced accidents, like traffic :) Sure it is simplification, but the point is that statistical average life duration and total lifespan of adult person have quite weak correlations.

Actually even now these early years are most risky ones, just the scale is different. Now I have witnesses bias here also - in my 40ies I can expect to live 50 years more, very different from a newborn with immediate terminal condition. So lifespan does have different meaning for us.

Re:Life Is Short (2016) by watwut on Sunday December 25, 2022 @06:20AM (#34126258)
It does not cancels out. It is not just simplification, you have to grossly overestimate traffic deaths now and underestimate accidental deaths in the past. (Basically regardless of when and where you place "the past".)

> Actually even now these early years are most risky ones, just the scale is different.

Babies mortality used to be huge too. And maternal mortality used to be huge by our standards too.

Re:Life Is Short (2016) by dorfsmay on Sunday December 25, 2022 @09:36AM (#34127554)
People used to die from transportation, drowning when crossing rivers, accidents around horses, etc... were very frequent. Safety codes are fairly modern.