News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Hobbit: Riddles in the Dark – The Lost Version by jfengel on Friday December 23, 2022 @04:33PM (#34110846)
His biographer says that Allen & Unwin (his publishers) asked for "a new Hobbit book". The earliest drafts are about a second adventure for Bilbo -- he had run out of money and needed a new treasure fetch-quest.

You can read the early drafts in book 6 of the History of Middle-earth, and watch as "the tale grew in the telling". They start with Bilbo, then the protagonist changes name and identity as the concept fills out. He made it as far as Bree in a very Hobbit-esque style before scrapping it all and rewriting it in the more adult LotR style.

(He later tried to re-write The Hobbit in that LotR style, but it was dreadfully boring and he gave up after a few chapters.)

Re:The Hobbit: Riddles in the Dark – The Lost Version by wolverine876 on Friday December 23, 2022 @04:52PM (#34111010)
> His biographer says that Allen & Unwin (his publishers) asked for "a new Hobbit book".

I wonder what the publisher's thoughts were about Tolkien's response: 'How about a six book, three volume epic, not suitable for much of the same audience (children), in essentially a new genre, with almost all new characters?'

Re:The Hobbit: Riddles in the Dark – The Lost Version by Someone1234 on Friday December 23, 2022 @05:14PM (#34111204)
Much like movies today, if the sequel comes out long enough after the original, and you want to target the SAME people, you go from children/YA to adult.

For example there was a 17-year gap between The Hobbit and LOTR's first two books.

Re:The Hobbit: Riddles in the Dark – The Lost Version by wolverine876 on Saturday December 24, 2022 @03:48PM (#34120945)
Great point. Interestingly, JK Rowling didn't do that.
Re:The Hobbit: Riddles in the Dark – The Lost Version by jfengel on Sunday December 25, 2022 @08:52AM (#34127223)
She did try. She just didn't handle it very well.