Re:WebAssembly: Docker Without Containers
by acdha on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @08:27PM
(#34088603)
Kind of - it was designed for Java so other languages were suboptimal for a long time, especially dynamic ones. Combined with the low quality of Java application servers and tooling, that approach was unpopular by the time things like InvokeDynamic matured and then Oracle’s licensing moves gave a lot of places reason for caution.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WebAssembly: Docker Without Containers
by int_19h on Sunday December 25, 2022 @10:04PM
(#34134116)
The biggest problem when compiling to JVM bytecode isn't dynamic languages - even if they are slower, it's tolerable. It's stuff like C++, where the whole point is being fast, but JVM simply lacks the necessary primitives to compile to.