News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by devnullbrain on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @10:38AM (#34082056)
Murder is even more effective.
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by int0x2e on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @01:04PM (#34084125)
In you had to murder someone, could you please target a billionaire? One who loves to take their private jet out on many 50 minute flights, if possible...
Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by simondotau on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @01:21PM (#34084341)
I would hope and assume that the community rules of HN don’t look kindly upon advocating the murder of any specific individuals.

That aside, I think it’s naive to assume that your proposed action would have a relevant outcome. Any successor is going to need to travel between facilities just as much — if not moreso — as they are brought up to speed and need to have ongoing meetings with executives and managers across a dozen locations.

Not to mention the travel involved in post-death matters of funerals, media coverage, high profile criminal investigations, and so on. And of course the wealth of one person then gets inherited by perhaps a dozen people, any of whom might live a more lavish (i.e. carbon intensive) lifestyle when they inherit even a small fraction of such enormous wealth.

Quite frankly I don’t see how your proposal has any chance of being remotely carbon positive.

Re:3M to end 'forever chemicals' output at cost of up to $2.3B by bernawil on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @02:21PM (#34085148)
vote for Genghis Khan of the Green Party!