Except that's not really what's happening. In Venezuela the only people using crypto to any extent is people who already are tech savvy and have the skills to work around these limitations. The "unbanked" however still don't use crypto and hardly any shops are using it because of the volatility and the long times to approve transactions. It's good for payments of services (e.g. utilities) I hear, however.

But I think more crucially is that what's increasingly looking like "the only good use of crypto" is really a consequence of social issues a similar way to how cars are very popular in countries with poor infrastructure (e.g. USA). If the country gets its act together, this aspect of crypto's value add vanishes and will just be seen as a slow and poor quality volatile payment system.

if the existence of cryptocurrency uhh, solves central banking then i think it will have achieved its purpose regardless

That's not the point OP is making.

"If the country gets its act together".. you know by fair elections, good governance and you know by similar such 'non-crypto' things.

Ok but the only one that even attempts to "solve" central banking is RAI. So according to your hypothesis, the vast majority of cryptocurrencies don't serve any purpose.

> Except that's not really what's happening.

Or maybe you are just ignorant? Here are some examples I have compiled (took me <5 min): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32406095

I've been in crypto a long time. I chose specifically Venezuela as I know that is a good case of Bitcoin not achieving its objectives and was called out specifically as an example of it supposedly being successful. And I very much stand by this and my related points.

> And I very much stand by this and my related points.

You say - "If the country gets its act together...". I think crypto will get its act together and get around the adoption blockers before despot regimes of the world get their act together. Just a gut feeling based on our history so far. I also agree that there will be multiple crypto scams along the way. Such is the allure of the new tech.

Since I cannot edit my other reply to this comment anymore, here is one more counterpoint: Nigeria is 11th in terms of Crypto adoption [1] while its government is hostile to Crypto [2]. A great example of how Crypto can help ordinary people fight shitty regimes with unstable currencies.

[1] https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/2022-global-crypto-adop...

[2] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-27/nigeria-s...

The idea that money (which is made as a mean of transmission between goods) should be hoarded is stupid.

No wealthy person in this planet got wealthier by hoarding pieces of paper with pictures of national heroes, but by investing it in gold, art, land, real estate, stock markets and many others.

If you and some other people agree that specific hashes on a specific blockchain have some value for you and avoid "debasing your savings" you're free to hoard them.

The problem isn't necessarily hoarding but rather governments decided to only have one legal tender and sabotaging that legal tender is effectively the same as sabotaging the entire economy. Hoarding is a kind of sabotage but if people hoard something that isn't legal tender they are not threatening the economy.

The wealthy might be hoarding Lamborghini's but we can always build more cars. Can't do that with money unless the government or a commercial bank does it.

Democratic world could provide that service without exposing their own citizens to a world of scams.

Furthermore, crypto is spectacularly effective at violating rights; "so, Mr Arnold, I see on the blockchain your paid for your wife to have an abortion. That's 10 years in jail for you".

Instead, by declining against the dollar by a factor of three in the past year, Bitcoin is quite good at debasing people's savings on its own.

Mere issuance isn't enough to guarantee price stability.

(There's an interesting question to be asked about whether the US should allow the usage of its digital dollars by non-US persons as a means of evading the currency controls of South American governments, effectively exporting price stability. Much as the existing Eurodollar system. But I don't think this is the place for that discussion)

> Instead, by declining against the dollar by a factor of three in the past year, Bitcoin is quite good at debasing people's savings on its own.

Srilankan rupee lost 50% value overnight in March 2022 and is subject to futher deterioration due to the corrupt incompetent government. Same with Venezuela. Bitcoin or Gold or USD/EUR are the only good options for the millions of citizens of those countries, albeit generally available on black markets because of government controls. My colleague has his family in such a country. Guess what is the easiest way for him to help his family in need? [Hint: gold is hard to transfer and USD/EUR transfers are sanctioned because of US/EU govt policies].

In these situations, I always have to ask: who's taking the other side of the transaction, and for what fee? Who's trading Bitcoin for rapidly inflating Sri Lankan rupees?

People who have opportunities to buy at shops with old prices is my guess.

One anecdote from someone I know personally - it is more of a barter. Her family needed to do a medical procedure, she transferred bitcoin from the US to her family who then gave that to Doctor in exchange for medical services. Probably, Bitcoin is working as intended?