News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Cost of Being Poor: Why It Costs So Much to Be Poor i... by etchalon on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @12:40AM (#34077097)
Growing up poor, my house and the house of my friends basically had three options – milk, sugar drinks and water. And milk was rationed like it was war.

Sugary drinks are cheap, shelf-stable and dense with calories.

When you don't have a lot of better options for calories, they fit the bill. It's not preference, it's survival.

We know that despite the difference in sugary drink consumption, obesity doesn't vary in population sets [0]:

"… evidence from 4 nationally representative US surveys has shown that populations who frequently consume sugar-sweetened beverages do not have a higher obesity rate or risk than populations who infrequently consume these beverages."

… which makes sense if sugary drinks are replacing calories that would otherwise be found in better foods.

[0]:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2957908/

Re:The Cost of Being Poor: Why It Costs So Much to Be Poor i... by maria2 on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @01:18AM (#34077311)
Sugary beverages have been correlated with obesity and weight gain in multiple other studies, however. One thing that’s interesting having read a few of these is that there are often contradictory results when doing meta-analysis of multiple studies.

Having empathy on a subject is definitely important. But it’s also important not to take an argument personally and not let personal anecdotes influence you more than they warrant. We’re not really talking about every poor person here and we’re not talking about your childhood friends. We’re mostly talking in generalizations about broad demographic trends.

Random study on obesity’s correlation with sugary drinks: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862465/

Re:The Cost of Being Poor: Why It Costs So Much to Be Poor i... by etchalon on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @01:40AM (#34077424)
The importance of the study I linked is that it examined consumption in low-income populations, and not the broader public.

As my point was that sugary drinks were a function of caloric replacement, and not preference, for low-income people – as was my lived experience – the study was relevant as it's the type of result you'd expect were that to be the case.

I was not arguing that sugary drinks don't contribute to obesity in the general public.

Re:The Cost of Being Poor: Why It Costs So Much to Be Poor i... by vondur on Wednesday December 21, 2022 @02:24AM (#34077657)
I too grew up poor and we never had soft drinks. Instead my mom would make us kool-aid on occasion. We almost exclusively ate at home, from food my mom prepared. We did have a kitchen, so if you don’t have access to a kitchen your options are limited.